Government Oversight Privacy Concerns

Hello Adv, government oversight can potentially infringe individual privacy rights in the following ways:
- Surveillance: Through monitoring of internet activities, phone calls, etc.
- Data Collection: Gathering personal data without consent.
- Unwarranted Searches: Conducting searches without proper legal procedure.
Please note, these actions are subject to laws and regulations.

Sure, Adv. I can provide you with some case laws related to privacy rights. However, could you please specify the jurisdiction you are interested in? For example, are you looking for cases from the Supreme Court of India, high courts of specific states, or any international cases? This will help me provide more targeted information.

Sure, here are a few Supreme Court cases related to privacy rights:
- K.S. Puttaswamy Vs Union of India (*): Recognized the right to privacy as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty.
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of India (*): Upheld Aadhaar as constitutionally valid but struck down some of its provisions.
- District Registrar and Collector vs Canara Bank (*): Recognized the right to privacy as a part of the right to "life" and "personal liberty".
Please note, these are summaries and you should read the full judgments for complete understanding.

Sure, Adv. Here are some Supreme Court cases that have been used to challenge government data collection:
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of India (*): The right to privacy was declared as a fundamental right, limiting the state's power to collect personal information.
- Anuradha Bhasin vs Union of India (*): Internet shutdowns without justification were ruled as unconstitutional, protecting data access rights.
Please read the full judgments for a comprehensive understanding.

It seems you're asking about the changes in the Puttaswamy judgment. In Puttaswamy I (*), the Supreme Court recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right. In Puttaswamy II (Aadhaar Case, *), the court upheld the validity of Aadhaar but struck down certain provisions. Could you clarify which specific provisions you're interested in?

In the second Puttaswamy case (*), some key provisions that were struck down include:
- Section *(*): Allowed disclosure of information under certain circumstances.
- Section *: Only allowed the authority to file complaints.
- Section *: Allowed private entities to demand Aadhaar data.
For a complete understanding, please read the full judgment.

In the first Puttaswamy case (*), the Supreme Court declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right. It does not strike down any specific provisions but laid down the foundation for challenging various laws on the grounds of privacy. For a complete understanding, please read the full judgment.

The principles or foundations associated with the first Puttaswamy case (*) are as follows:
- Privacy is a fundamental right under Article * of the Constitution.
- It includes the right to bodily integrity, informational privacy, privacy of personal behavior, and the privacy of communication.
- Any law infringing on privacy must satisfy the test of legality, need, and proportionality.