Settlement Agreement Legalities

Ask Your Question For Free

Summary

Settlement agreements in South Dakota commonly include a release of claims clause, which prevents further legal actions against the at-fault party. This applies even if the payment is specified for pain and suffering. Always review the agreement carefully and consult a lawyer if you have any concerns about the terms.

Full Conversation

I was in a car accident reached a agreement on a settlement for pain and suffering. When the contract came it had a clause that i couldn't pursue any other legal actions against the at faults party. The part about not being able to sue for other things was not asked or was it disclosed by the insurance agency. It was dor pain and suffering only is that legsl?
Hello ****, it would be helpful if you could share your location as laws can vary by jurisdiction. Generally, it's quite common for settlement agreements to include a clause preventing further lawsuits against the party at fault. This is known as a "release of claims" clause.
South Dakota
In South Dakota, it is legal for settlement agreements to include a "release of claims" clause. This typically means:
- You cannot sue the at-fault party for the same incident.
- You should carefully review the agreement before signing.
- Consult a lawyer if you have concerns about the terms.
Even if they said the payment was jyst for pain and suffering
Yes, even if the payment was only for pain and suffering. Once you sign the release, you generally cannot pursue further legal actions related to the incident. It's advisable to consult a lawyer if you have doubts.