Ltb Review Request Deadlines

In Ontario, the *-day period for filing a review request with the LTB starts the day after the order is issued. Weekends and statutory holidays are included in this count. If the 30th day falls on a weekend/holiday, the deadline extends to the next business day.

In Ontario, a landlord generally cannot enter your unit without your consent or without providing * hours written notice, even after an eviction order unless it's for a reasonable purpose like an emergency. However, harassment is never permitted. If you're experiencing this, consider seeking legal help.

*. The tenant wasn't properly served with a Notice of Hearing.
*. The LTB made a factual error that affected the outcome.
*. The LTB didn't consider important evidence.
*. The tenant wasn't given a chance to present their case.
*. The LTB misapplied the law.
*. The order was issued without a hearing.
*. The LTB allowed evidence that should've been excluded.
*. The landlord provided false evidence.
*. The tenant wasn't informed of their rights during the hearing.
*. The LTB issued an order for an amount greater than legally allowable.

Sure, here are additional examples:
*. The tenant wasn't given enough time to prepare their defense.
*. The landlord used intimidating tactics during the hearing.
*. The LTB didn't provide proper translation services if required.
*. The LTB didn't properly accommodate the tenant's disabilities.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's retaliatory behavior.
*. The LTB ignored tenant's claim of necessary repairs not carried out.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of illegal rent increase.
*. The LTB failed to consider tenant's claim of habitability issues.
*. The LTB ignored tenant's claim of landlord's discrimination.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's breach of quiet enjoyment.
Real World Example: In Ontario, a tenant successfully requested a review after the LTB issued an eviction order without considering the tenant's evidence of landlord's harassment and refusal to carry out necessary repairs.

Apologies for the confusion. Here are * more examples:
*. The LTB didn't consider claims of landlord's illegal entry into the unit.
*. The LTB didn't consider the tenant's evidence of landlord's invasion of privacy.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's failure to provide vital services.
*. The LTB failed to consider claims of landlord's wrongful withholding of security deposit.
*. The LTB ignored the tenant's claim of landlord's failure to maintain common areas.
*. The LTB didn't consider the tenant's evidence of landlord's violation of lease agreement.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's failure to manage pests.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's inadequate response to a noise complaint.
*. The LTB failed to consider tenant's claim of landlord's refusal to accommodate a disability.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's failure to provide heat in winter.

Of course, here are another * examples:
*. The LTB ignored tenant's claim of landlord's refusal to fix broken appliances.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's failure to ensure safety measures.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's negligence in addressing mold issues.
*. The LTB ignored tenant's claim of landlord's unfair eviction notice.
*. The LTB failed to consider tenant's claim of landlord's refusal to renew lease without valid reason.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's inappropriate behavior.
*. The LTB ignored tenant's claim of landlord's failure to provide proper ventilation.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's failure to provide clean drinking water.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's violation of tenant's right to quiet enjoyment.
*. The LTB ignored tenant's claim of landlord's failure to provide proper waste disposal facilities.
*. The LTB didn't consider tenant's claim of landlord's violation of privacy rights.
*. The LTB didn