Insurance Contract Clause Dispute

Ask Your Question For Free

Summary

Insurance agencies must disclose all terms before signing. Adding undisclosed clauses may breach the contract. Consult a legal professional for advice.

Full Conversation

I am wondering can a insurance agency add something to a contract that wasn't discussed or asked by me?
Hello ****, in general, insurance agencies should disclose all terms and conditions of a contract before you sign it. If they add something without your knowledge or consent, it could potentially be a breach of contract. However, the exact rules can vary by state. In South Dakota, the state's insurance code might provide further guidance.
If a insurance agency says the settlement is for pain and suffering and they didn't say i couldn't sue the other people or did I ask if I could sue the other people for more damages but put in the contract that I couldn't is that against the law
In South Dakota, insurance contracts should be transparent and explicit. If the contract included a clause that limits your rights without prior discussion or clear explanation, it might be considered unfair. However, it's crucial for you to seek advice from a legal professional to understand the full implications.
The at fault insurance company offered my a settlement for pain and suffering. It wasn't disclosed to me or did i ask but in the settlement agreement the at faults insurance agency put in the contract I couldn't sue for other damages can they do that?
In South Dakota, it's common for insurance settlements to include a clause releasing the at-fault party from further claims. However, such terms should be transparent and agreed upon. It's important to consult a lawyer before signing any settlement agreement to ensure your rights are protected.
What if the at faults insurance company put the wrong city in a settlement claim and i accepted. Could I sue in the city it actually happened at still get the money from the at faults insurance company?
In South Dakota, the location of the incident generally doesn't affect the validity of the settlement. However, if you believe there was a mistake, it's essential to consult a legal professional. Misrepresentation could potentially invalidate a contract, but the specifics will depend on the circumstances.
If an insurance agency settlement says I can't sue in a city that the accident didn't happen and I accept the offer can I sue them in the city the accident did happen?
In South Dakota, if you've accepted a settlement, it typically means you've agreed to not sue further. However, if the settlement has a misrepresentation like the wrong city, it might affect the contract validity. It's essential to consult a legal professional for accurate advice.
So can a at faults party insurance company add stipulations that weren't talked about or aske? They stated that the settlement was for pain and suffering and never stated that I wouldn't be able to go after their client for other damages but put it in the settlement contract
In South Dakota, all terms of a settlement should be discussed and agreed upon before signing. If an insurer added a clause without your knowledge or consent, it might be seen as unfair. It's crucial to consult a legal professional to understand the full implications and your rights.
Can i sue a insurance agency for adding a clause in a settlement agreement that wasn't discussed or asked about?
In South Dakota, if terms were added without your knowledge or consent, it could potentially be a breach of contract. However, it's crucial to consult a legal professional to understand the full implications and your potential course of action.
If a at faults insurance agency said the money i was to get was for pain and suffering, but in the settlement contract they added I couldn't sue for anything else is that legal? As it wasn't asked or dicussed
In South Dakota, if an insurance agency inserted a clause in the settlement agreement preventing you from suing for additional damages without discussing it with you, it could potentially be a breach of contract. It is recommended to consult with a legal professional for guidance.
can i sue an insurance agency for saying that payment is for one thing then in the settlement contract they added that i couldn't sue for other damages
In South Dakota, if an insurance agency added a clause in your settlement agreement that wasn't discussed and you are unhappy with it, you may have grounds to sue. However, it's recommended to consult a legal professional for personalized advice.