Child Support Judge Concerns

Alisa

I have some questions about child support cases and judges in Chicago Illinois cook county first district if I am provided overwhelming documented evidence to the child support judge meaning the non-custodial parents bank statements that provide direct evidence of his actual income income cycling income diversion and income concealment along with other documented financial disclosures that provide direct evidence of of explanations that to not match up and this child support judge does not take any of those documented evidence into consideration and actually starts making excuses for the noncustodial parents Bank statements such as stating that probably his girlfriend and him are just helping each other financially when the phone data girlfriend has not been working since * also Zell payments received from the girlfriends 30 year old son and then sent to the girlfriend on the same day the judge made an excuse for that also stating that probably the kid told him money for 30 year old man is not a kid this judge did not order him to pay for our son‘s college education or any other expenses related to college what was taken into consideration is the non-custodial parents false statements that he is in debt That he has another biological child with special needs without any provided documented evidence which I find odd

You’re not understanding me when the judge is provided With documented evidence such as for noncustodial parents bank statements that directly prove income cycling diversion and concealment which she overlooks but she believes and took into consideration false statements without any documented evidence I find that concerning and odd as the non-custodial parent has not been Health accountable for anything of his actions and on top of that she ordered me to provide my daughters identification pin to the noncustodial parent so you can benefit of taxis while depriving her it doesn’t make sense

Is a judge supposed to be making excuses for the noncustodial parents bank statements I’ve never seen such a thing or heard of such a thing as the judge is supposed to take into consideration and prioritize the children directly affected in this case

I just want to know is it common for a child support judge provide it with direct evidence to make excuses for the noncustodial parent meaning discord actually helped him deprive children financial

Again you’re not understanding me if I provide discharge with direct evidence because the noncustodial parents bank statements are direct evidence and the non-custodial parent provides discharge with false statements without any documented evidence it’s concerning that the judge took into consideration the non-custodial parents false statements without any provided documented evidence and she bypassed or overlooked the documented evidence I provided to her

I mean what else kind of evidence does this judge need I provided his bank statements which directly provide his actual income cash deposits Zell payments received under the table is bank statements also provide direct evidence of income cycling diversion concealment other documented evidence such as the sources he receives the under the table and come from all of it was overlooked by this judge she did take into consideration and made her ruling based on the noncustodial parents false statements without any documented evidence which was talking

I wanna know what else evidence she actually need it more than what I provided