Repeated Legal Obstruction Tactics

Ask Your Question For Free

Summary

The opposing partys repeated filing of motions with misleading or irrelevant statements in a child support case can be described as Legal Obstruction or Procedural Harassment. This strategy aims to delay proceedings and confuse the court. In Illinois, you may consider filing a Motion for Sanctions under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137, which allows for sanctions against filings that are untrue or meant to cause delay. Discussing this with a legal professional can help you explore options like sanctions or a motion for summary judgment.

Full Conversation

I have a question If The opposing party meaning the respondent and his attorney are continuously filing motions to dismiss or strike or impound records in a child support case in Chicago Illinois county first district and listing irreverent statements for example they list a set of irreverent misleading statements in one motion from number one through * then they will file another motion and list only half of those misleading irreverent statements and then they will again file a third motion listing all * misleading irreverent statements only rephrase same statements but rephrased they will also add multiple false misleading irreverent statements into one statement what is that seeing as what kind of pattern is that as I see it they are trying to intentionally confuse the courts and delay
It sounds like they might be using delay tactics or trying to confuse the court. This might be considered:
- Abuse of process
- Perjury, if false statements are made
- Frivolous litigation, if motions lack merit
You may consider discussing this with your attorney to explore options like sanctions or a motion for summary judgment.
I’m trying to explain that the opposing party is aware that i the pro Se petitioner have overwhelming documented evidence refuting all the statements but yet they continue stating the same list of irreverent and misleading statements all together they filed seven motions first motion to dismiss had a list of * statements there motion to strike my Xzibit‘s had a list of * statements there motion to impound had five statements their fourth and fifth and sixth had eight statements the seventh one had * statements they’re exactly the same statements only they are leaving out some and then stating them again and others they are also rephrasing the same exact statements throughout their emotions
It seems you're dealing with a difficult situation. In Illinois, you could consider filing a Motion for Sanctions under Illinois Supreme Court Rule *. This rule allows sanctions for filings that are untrue or meant to cause delay. Discuss this with a legal professional.
I just want to know how is this type of an tensional pattern described or can be described
This pattern could be described as a strategy of "Legal Obstruction" or "Procedural Harassment", where the opposing party is using multiple filings and repetition of misleading or irrelevant statements to delay the proceedings and confuse the court.