Retroactive Child Support Petition

Hello Alisa,
You can file a "Petition for Rule to Show Cause." This asks the court to enforce the child support order. In the petition, specify the issue with the non-custodial parent's employer withholding less than the ordered amount.

I'm sorry, but as an AI, I can't provide visual examples. However, your local court clerk's office or law library may have templates of "Petition for Rule to Show Cause" that you can use as a guide. Consider visiting them for assistance.

Yes, you can title it "Petition for Rule to Show Cause." In it, describe the issue, stating that the noncustodial parent's employer has failed to withhold the full ordered amount, causing a past due amount of $*. Be clear and specific in your statement.

Yes, Alisa. You file the "Petition for Rule to Show Cause" against the noncustodial parent as they are responsible for the child support order. It's the court's role to enforce this order if not adhered to.

After titling your document "Petition for Rule to Show Cause," you would address it to the court and state your case. Could you clarify what you're unsure about? Answer: I'm confused about how to write the introduction and present my case in the document.

That sounds like a good start, Alisa. Just remember to clearly state the amount that hasn't been withheld ($*, as you mentioned earlier), and the child support order that was violated. Also, include the details of the wage withholding notice from HFS.

Your introduction is correct. After presenting your case, you should also include:
- The specific order that was violated.
- Details of the wage withholding notice from HFS.
- The total amount ($*) not withheld.
- Your request for the court to enforce the child support order.

After titling your document "Petition for Rule to Show Cause", you could write something like this:
"Now comes the petitioner, [Your Name], proceeding pro se, and respectfully represents to the court the following: The respondent, NASER Beganovic, or his employer, Car Tronics USA, has failed to comply with the child support order by not withholding the correct amount, thereby causing a past due amount of $*."

That seems like a good start, Alisa. Make sure to include the specifics of the case: the non-compliance of the child support order by NASER Beganovic or his employer, Car Tronics USA, and the resulting past due amount of $*. Don't forget to state your request for the court to enforce the order.

Sure, here is an example:
"Title: Petition for Rule to Show Cause
Now comes the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, proceeding pro se, and states as follows:
*. The Respondent, NASER Beganovic, or his employer, Car Tronics USA, has failed to comply with the child support order.
*. This non-compliance has resulted in a past due amount of $*.
*. The Petitioner respectfully requests the court to enforce the child support order."
I hope this example helps clarify things for you.

For number one, you could state: "The employer of respondent, NASER Beganovic, namely Car Tronics USA, has failed to comply with the child support order by not withholding the correct amount as per the wage withholding notices from HFS."

Yes, Alisa. That's correct. You should specify the dates the notices were sent and the total amount they were ordered to withhold. By doing so, you provide clear evidence of non-compliance with the court order.

The wage withholding notices should have been sent by the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services (HFS) to the non-custodial parent's employer. If you need copies, you may need to request them from HFS or the employer directly.

You can state it like this: "The Respondent's employer, Car Tronics USA, failed to comply with wage withholding notices issued by HFS on February *, *, and May *, *. They were ordered to withhold $*.* biweekly. They have been withholding only $*.*, resulting in a shortfall of $* biweekly, accumulating to a total retroactive debt for child support."

You can list it this way:
*. "Petition for Rule to Show Cause"
*. "The Respondent's employer, Car Tronics USA, failed to comply with wage withholding notices issued by HFS on February *, *, and May *, *, which ordered them to withhold $*.* bi-weekly."
*. "Only $*.* has been withheld bi-weekly, resulting in a $* shortfall each period, and a total retroactive debt for child support."

You can rephrase point number three as follows: "There has been a consistent deficiency of $* in the bi-weekly withholding, leading to a cumulative unpaid retroactive child support debt."

You can state: "The Respondent's employer, Car Tronics USA, has been withholding only $*.* bi-weekly instead of the ordered $*.*. This indicates a failure to withhold the retroactive child support payments of $* bi-weekly."

You can state: "Car Tronics USA, the respondent's employer, was withholding only $*.* bi-weekly, instead of the required $*.*. This resulted in a failure to send the retroactive child support payments of $* bi-weekly."

In your petition, you could state: "The respondent's employer, Car Tronics USA, has been withholding $*.* bi-weekly, instead of the required $*.*, failing to remit the arrears in child support payments."

"Arrears" refers to the money that is owed and should have been paid earlier. In your case, it would be the unpaid child support that has accumulated over time.

Yes, you're correct. The "past due support" of $* is the retroactive child support that hasn't been paid. It accumulates over time, increasing the total amount of child support arrears.

You can state: "The respondent's employer, Car Tronics USA, was not withholding the total amount of $*.*, as required by the HFS wage withholding notices. This total includes both the regular monthly child support of $*.* and the retroactive amount of $*."

You can state: "Car Tronics USA failed to comply with HFS wage withholding notices, not withholding the full $*.*. This non-compliance led to an accumulation of unpaid retroactive child support, resulting in a due amount of $*."