TRY ME!
Potential Professional Misconduct Concerns
Ask Your Question For FreeSummary
Subject: Concerns Regarding Potential Professional Misconduct in Child Protection Case Dear [Recipient], I am writing to highlight potential professional misconduct by Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer at the Department of Communities. This pertains to the child protection case involving Mr. Andrew Thompson, who has admitted to family and domestic violence coercive control. On 18th July, Mr. Thompsons lawyer requested an extension to submit affidavits from Mr. Thompson, his partner Ms. Rebecca Amelia Carrington, and Ms. Bartel. Coincidentally, the Department of Communities interviewed the children on the same day, unbeknownst to Mr. Thompson. All affidavits were submitted to the family court the following day, while the case was still under investigation. Ms. Bartel provided a character reference for Mr. Thompson, in support of her friend Ms. Carrington, during this ongoing investigation. Given their long-standing friendship and social interactions, this raises fundamental questions about her professional conduct and ethics. Furthermore, Ms. BartelsFull Conversation
Can you make the letter sound better
Subject: Concerns of Potential Professional Misconduct and Abuse of Power
I am writing to bring to light potential issues of professional misconduct and abuse of power involving Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer in the Department of Communities. My concerns arise from her provision of a character affidavit for Andrew Thompson, during an ongoing child protection case.
Ms. Bartel, a close friend of Rebecca Amelia Carrington, has shown a potential conflict of interest. Her actions raise significant questions about her professional conduct and ethics. The timing of her affidavit, signed on 19th July *, while the case was still open, underscores these concerns.
As a trained professional, Ms. Bartel should be aware of manipulative behaviors like “love bombing.” Her potential misuse of professional influence should not overshadow the lived experiences of those involved. This situation requires thorough examination to ensure the rights and welfare of all parties are duly upheld.
In light of the above, I urge you to scrutinize this matter to ensure the integrity of our child protection system and its professionals. I understand that in Western Australia, laws and protocols such as the Public Sector Management Act * and the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act * are in place to address such concerns. Any potential violation of
I am writing to bring to light potential issues of professional misconduct and abuse of power involving Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer in the Department of Communities. My concerns arise from her provision of a character affidavit for Andrew Thompson, during an ongoing child protection case.
Ms. Bartel, a close friend of Rebecca Amelia Carrington, has shown a potential conflict of interest. Her actions raise significant questions about her professional conduct and ethics. The timing of her affidavit, signed on 19th July *, while the case was still open, underscores these concerns.
As a trained professional, Ms. Bartel should be aware of manipulative behaviors like “love bombing.” Her potential misuse of professional influence should not overshadow the lived experiences of those involved. This situation requires thorough examination to ensure the rights and welfare of all parties are duly upheld.
In light of the above, I urge you to scrutinize this matter to ensure the integrity of our child protection system and its professionals. I understand that in Western Australia, laws and protocols such as the Public Sector Management Act * and the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act * are in place to address such concerns. Any potential violation of
can you write the complete letter
Subject: Concerns Regarding Potential Professional Misconduct
Dear [Recipient],
I write to express my concerns about potential professional misconduct involving Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer with the Department of Communities.
Ms. Bartel provided a character affidavit for Mr. Andrew Thompson amidst an ongoing child protection investigation. The affidavit was given on 19th July *, while the investigation was still open. This action raises serious questions about her professional conduct.
Moreover, Ms. Bartel's close relationship with Ms. Rebecca Amelia Carrington, a friend of Mr. Thompson, suggests a conflict of interest. This connection deepens my concerns, as it may have influenced her professional judgment.
As a trained professional, Ms. Bartel should be aware of manipulative behaviors like “love bombing.” However, her actions suggest a potential misuse of professional influence.
In light of these concerns, I urge a thorough examination of this matter. The integrity of our child protection system and its professionals must be maintained.
Given Western Australian laws, such as the Public Sector Management Act * and the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act *, it's crucial that potential misconduct is appropriately handled.
I trust you will give this matter the attention it requires.
Yours sincerely,
Dear [Recipient],
I write to express my concerns about potential professional misconduct involving Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer with the Department of Communities.
Ms. Bartel provided a character affidavit for Mr. Andrew Thompson amidst an ongoing child protection investigation. The affidavit was given on 19th July *, while the investigation was still open. This action raises serious questions about her professional conduct.
Moreover, Ms. Bartel's close relationship with Ms. Rebecca Amelia Carrington, a friend of Mr. Thompson, suggests a conflict of interest. This connection deepens my concerns, as it may have influenced her professional judgment.
As a trained professional, Ms. Bartel should be aware of manipulative behaviors like “love bombing.” However, her actions suggest a potential misuse of professional influence.
In light of these concerns, I urge a thorough examination of this matter. The integrity of our child protection system and its professionals must be maintained.
Given Western Australian laws, such as the Public Sector Management Act * and the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act *, it's crucial that potential misconduct is appropriately handled.
I trust you will give this matter the attention it requires.
Yours sincerely,
Can you write the complete letter including the acts and leglastions as well as all details from the original letter uploaded please
Subject: Concerns Regarding Potential Professional Misconduct
Dear [Recipient],
I'm writing to express serious concerns about potential professional misconduct involving Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer with the Department of Communities.
Ms. Bartel provided a character affidavit for Mr. Andrew Thompson amidst an ongoing child protection investigation. This action, taken on 19th July *, raises questions about her professional conduct.
Moreover, Ms. Bartel's close relationship with Ms. Rebecca Amelia Carrington, a friend of Mr. Thompson, suggests a conflict of interest. This connection deepens my concerns, as it may have influenced her professional judgment.
As stated in the Public Sector Management Act *, public officers are expected to uphold certain standards of conduct. Her actions may breach these standards.
Furthermore, manipulative behaviors such as “love bombing” are concerning, especially coming from a trained professional. This could be viewed as a misuse of professional influence.
In light of these concerns, I urge a thorough examination of this matter, as required under the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act *.
The integrity of our child protection system and its professionals must be maintained.
I trust you will
Dear [Recipient],
I'm writing to express serious concerns about potential professional misconduct involving Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer with the Department of Communities.
Ms. Bartel provided a character affidavit for Mr. Andrew Thompson amidst an ongoing child protection investigation. This action, taken on 19th July *, raises questions about her professional conduct.
Moreover, Ms. Bartel's close relationship with Ms. Rebecca Amelia Carrington, a friend of Mr. Thompson, suggests a conflict of interest. This connection deepens my concerns, as it may have influenced her professional judgment.
As stated in the Public Sector Management Act *, public officers are expected to uphold certain standards of conduct. Her actions may breach these standards.
Furthermore, manipulative behaviors such as “love bombing” are concerning, especially coming from a trained professional. This could be viewed as a misuse of professional influence.
In light of these concerns, I urge a thorough examination of this matter, as required under the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act *.
The integrity of our child protection system and its professionals must be maintained.
I trust you will
I understand that in Western Australia, laws and protocols such as the Public Sector Management Act * and the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act * are in place to address such concerns. Any potential violation of
these acts should be reported to the relevant authorities such as the Public Sector Commission or the Corruption and Crime Commission in Western Australia. This would help ensure that any misconduct is appropriately addressed and the integrity of the child protection system is maintained.
can I requestion the number od time Holly jade bartel accessed the file in question
Absolutely, you have the right to request such information. In Western Australia, you can go through the Freedom of Information Act * (WA) to request access to documents held by government agencies. Remember to specify the documents you are seeking in your application.
can I requested the departments log of staff who accessed the file
Yes, under the Freedom of Information Act * (WA), you may request access to the department's log of staff who accessed a particular file. Your request should be specific about the documents you want to access.
is ther a confidentually and p[rivacy issue
Yes, confidentiality and privacy are critical in legal matters. The Privacy Act * (Cth) and the Australian Privacy Principles guide the handling of personal information. Misuse of personal information may constitute a breach of these laws.
Can you rewrite this letter using all the information? I would like to take the opportunity to provide information regarding Holly Jade Bartel’s potential misconduct.
On the 18th of July, Andrew Thompson’s lawyer requested an extension to provide affidavits from Andrew, his partner Rebecca Amelia Carrington, and Holly Jade Bartel until the 19th of July. Coincidentally, the Department of Communities, Child Protection interviewed the children on the 18th of July without Andrew’s knowledge. On the 19th of July, all three affidavits were witnessed in Kalgoorlie and submitted to the family court while the investigation was still open. coincidentally Andrew Thompson's lawyer requested an extension on the 18th of July to provide the affidavits on the 19th of July
Andrew has admitted to family and domestic violence coercive control in his affidavits and his response to Form * filed with the family court. However, his admission includes significant minimisation, lack of accountability, and excuses, such as blaming the environment in Karratha for his abusive behaviour towards myself and my four daughters. This reasoning could potentially provide an unacceptable excuse for others to be abusive.
It is crucial to highlight potential issues of professional misconduct and abuse of power. Ms. Bartel, in her capacity as a Child Protection Officer in the Department of Communities, provided a character reference for Andrew in support of her friend Rebecca Amelia Carrington while a child protection case was still under investigation. This raises fundamental questions about professional conduct and ethics.
Rebecca Amelia Carrington and Holly Jade Bartel have a long-standing friendship, having holidayed together and socially interacted with the other parties involved. As a trained professional, Holly Bartel should be well-versed in identifying toxic behaviours such as “love bombing,” which refers to excessive praise, flattery, and attention to gain trust and loyalty. This behaviour can be manipulative and harmful.
The timing and context of Ms Bartel’s affidavit, signed on the 19th of July * while the case was still open and under investigation, further underscore the potential misconduct. It is crucial that such actions are scrutinised to ensure the integrity of the child protection system and the professionals who serve within it. The lived experiences of those involved should not be overshadowed by the misuse of professional influence. This situation warrants a thorough examination to ensure that the rights and welfare of all parties involved are upheld. The potential misuse of professional influence in this context is a matter of grave concern.
In Western Australia, there are specific laws and protocols in place to handle such situations:
- The Public Sector Management Act * outlines standards of conduct expected from public officers.
- The Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act * facilitates reporting and investigation of misconduct.
You might consider making a formal complaint to the Public Sector Commission or the Corruption and Crime Commission in Western Australia.
under the Freedom of Information Act * (WA), I am requesting access to the department's log of staff who have accessed any files concerning my children and the matters that have been brought to the department.
I also have concerns regarding any future reports that may need to involve the Department of Communities as I am sure you can understand that if this cannot be made with our privacy and confidentiality and the safety concerns considered, this impacts our ability to have equitable access to the department due to potential future misconduct of the departments staff. Confidentiality and privacy are critical in legal matters. The Privacy Act * (Cth) and the Australian Privacy Principles guide the handling of personal information. Misuse of personal information may constitute a breach of these laws.
Subject: Concerns Regarding Potential Professional Misconduct in Child Protection Case
Dear [Recipient],
I am writing to highlight potential professional misconduct by Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer at the Department of Communities. This pertains to the child protection case involving Mr. Andrew Thompson, who has admitted to family and domestic violence coercive control.
On 18th July, Mr. Thompson's lawyer requested an extension to submit affidavits from Mr. Thompson, his partner Ms. Rebecca Amelia Carrington, and Ms. Bartel. Coincidentally, the Department of Communities interviewed the children on the same day, unbeknownst to Mr. Thompson. All affidavits were submitted to the family court the following day, while the case was still under investigation.
Ms. Bartel provided a character reference for Mr. Thompson, in support of her friend Ms. Carrington, during this ongoing investigation. Given their long-standing friendship and social interactions, this raises fundamental questions about her professional conduct and ethics.
Furthermore, Ms. Bartel's affidavit, signed on 19th July *, underscores the potential misconduct. It is vital that such actions are scrutinised to ensure the integrity of the child protection system and the professionals within it.
In Western Australia,
Dear [Recipient],
I am writing to highlight potential professional misconduct by Ms. Holly Jade Bartel, a Child Protection Officer at the Department of Communities. This pertains to the child protection case involving Mr. Andrew Thompson, who has admitted to family and domestic violence coercive control.
On 18th July, Mr. Thompson's lawyer requested an extension to submit affidavits from Mr. Thompson, his partner Ms. Rebecca Amelia Carrington, and Ms. Bartel. Coincidentally, the Department of Communities interviewed the children on the same day, unbeknownst to Mr. Thompson. All affidavits were submitted to the family court the following day, while the case was still under investigation.
Ms. Bartel provided a character reference for Mr. Thompson, in support of her friend Ms. Carrington, during this ongoing investigation. Given their long-standing friendship and social interactions, this raises fundamental questions about her professional conduct and ethics.
Furthermore, Ms. Bartel's affidavit, signed on 19th July *, underscores the potential misconduct. It is vital that such actions are scrutinised to ensure the integrity of the child protection system and the professionals within it.
In Western Australia,