Venue Favorable To Plaintiff

Ask Your Question For Free

Summary

A case in the Southern District of New York may favor the plaintiff if the defendant resides there, the events leading to the lawsuit occurred there, or the dispute has a significant connection to the district. Precedents in the Second Circuit, such as Leroy v. Great Western United Corp. (1979), establish that a defendants business activities within a jurisdiction can establish venue. Notable cases like United States v. Windsor (2012) and Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp. (1998) may also be relevant depending on the specifics of the case. Always consult with a legal professional for case-specific advice.

Full Conversation

and what precedents would the plaintiff rest upon what cases law
The precedents a plaintiff could rest upon vary greatly based on the specifics of the case. They often rely on past cases with similar circumstances where the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff. Can you provide more information about the nature of your case? It will help me provide more targeted information.
name a few in the second circuit
Here are a few notable cases from the Second Circuit:
*. United States v. Windsor (*): Set precedent on federal recognition of same-sex marriage.
*. Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp. (*): Established standards for fair use in copyright law.
*. Filártiga v. Peña-Irala (*): Influential in the area of human rights.

Please note that the relevance and applicability of these cases depend on the nature of your legal issue.
what cases in the * circuit allows vunue to teh plaintiff if the defendant does and has a business in that venue
In the Second Circuit, the case Leroy v. Great Western United Corp. (*) established that a defendant's business activities within a jurisdiction could establish venue. However, the nature of the business activities and its connection to the lawsuit are crucial factors. Always consult with a legal professional for case-specific advice.