Legal Agreement Terminology Ontario

Ask Your Question For Free

Summary

Agreed with joined issues in Ontario means both parties concur on the issues presented. When the plaintiff and defendant disagree on certain points, they are said to be joining issue. Citing relevant statutes and laws can help substantiate a partys perspective in a case.

Full Conversation

Meaninv oc agreed with joined issues in reply to statements in ontario
Hello ****, it seems like you're asking about legal terminology used in Ontario. "Agreed with joined issues in reply to statements" typically means both parties concur on the issues presented in the case. Can you provide more specific context for better assistance?
Agreed on same points , that issue is present
Hello ****, it appears you're seeking clarity on an agreement between parties in a case in Ontario. Could you provide more details about the case or the specifics of your agreement? It will help me give you a more accurate response.
Defense denied outlined details of their version . Plaintifc does agree that issues are present and differ in perspective
Hello ****. It seems you're dealing with a discrepancy between the plaintiff's and defendant's perspectives on a case in Ontario. For a more accurate interpretation, could you please provide more details or context about the issues in question?
Defendant denies alligations , plaintiff denies parts of it , does this mean plaintiff joins issue with defendant
In legal terms, "joining issue" means that both parties disagree on a point, leading to a contested point of fact or law. So, if the plaintiff denies some parts of the defendant's allegations, it can be said that they are joining issue on those points.
Would it be safe to say that part that hold no validity , they add their perspective i. A sentence or two
Hello ****, in a legal context, both parties can present their perspectives. However, a perspective doesn't necessarily hold validity unless it can be substantiated with evidence. Could you please specify the part you're referring to?
So cited statue and law would suffice then
Yes, ****, citing relevant statutes and laws can certainly help to substantiate a party's perspective in a case. This can be especially useful when there's a disagreement or 'joined issue' between the parties.