Legal Letter Review Tips

Summary

Your letter is detailed but complex. Simplify language for clarity, provide evidence for claims, and seek legal advice to ensure your arguments about administrative courts and liability orders are sound. Present your case effectively in court with supporting evidence.

Full Conversation

please check all paragraphs of my letter advise of any errors: Subject: Rejection of Alleged 'Liability Order Notification' This communication is open and all rights reserved *. This letter responds to your correspondence dated 10th July *, concerning the alleged 'Lia-bility Order' Notification for the beneficiary of the trust at ‘THE MOORINGS, HIGH STREET, BARNBY DUN, DONCASTER, DN3 1DY’ *. Kindly note, a notification to a representative equates to a notification to the principal, and re-ciprocally. *. Please be acknowledged that MR GJ TAYLOR pertains to the Crown copyrighted name of my Cestui Que trust. I am the sole beneficiary. *. I trust you've acquainted yourself with the pertinent laws in effect. If not, allow me to briefly illuminate their current relevance. *. Primarily, the Local Government Finance Act * empowers the hmrc to issue bills through councils acting as billing authorities. *. Specifically, Sections * and * mandate council tax on Chargeable Dwellings, known as Heredit-ament and Composite Hereditament. *. Additionally, the Act cross-references the Local Government Finance Act * and the General Rates Act *, specifically Section * of the latter, relating to Schedule *. *. As per the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations *, Schedule * Form A, utilized for the formulation of liability orders, was withdrawn on 1st October *. *. The law is unambiguous in asserting administrative courts are illicit, with ‘no legal authority’ to back them in England and no Act can validate them due to constitutional limitations. *. Collection of revenue through such channels can be ‘considered extortion’. *. It is crucial to note that no entity, be it local or otherwise, specifically those operating as for-profit DUNS registered corporations, possess either the legal entitlement or judicial competence to issue or enforce a summons. *. If one argues that Common Law holds no ground in administrative law proceedings, thereby ren-dering it inconsequential, it's worth mentioning that ‘administrative law lacks formal endorse-ment by the Parliament’. *. His Majesty the King, during Coronation, pledged to govern in accordance with our respective traditions and legalities, incorporating the threefold division of powers. *. The judiciary, a fundamental facet of the traditional internal sovereignty system, must safeguard the legislative authority against executive overreach. *. As the Chief Executive, it's paramount for you to grasp the Council's 'lawful position' concerning the insinuated facts before initiating any court summons or recovery actions. *. I acknowledge Halsbury's Laws of England as an authoritative source on England’s Laws. *. These laws expound on our legislation, including significant acts like the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, and the Act of Settlement, which form our constitutional principles. *. As affirmed by Lord Halsbury and Lord Denning, no court can exist in England without the authority of the Crown and Parliament. *. 'lord halsbury demonstrates clearly the domestic property was removed from rating/taxation' *. Judges' Oaths, under Section * of the Promissory Oaths Act *, prohibit administrative acts on behalf of the executive. Contravening this Oath constitutes perjury. *. Administrative law, per Halsbury’s Law *, serves as a bridge between the Judiciary and Executive. However, England lacks legislated administrative courts. *. The British Constitution, while unwritten, is encapsulated in common law and key historical statutes. *. These statutes, such as Magna Carta (*), the Bill of Rights (*), the Act of Settlement (*), and the Septennial Act *, form the cornerstone of our constitutional principles. *. Any Act that amends or adds to these can be considered a constitutional Act, the interpretation of which confers fundamental rights that cannot be displaced without clear wording. *. Our Constitution originates from the Magna Carta *, the Bill of Rights (*), the Act of Settlement (*), the Septennial Act *, and others like the Parliament Acts * and *, the Supreme Court Act * (now cited as Senior Courts Act * post the Constitutional Reform Act *), to name a few. *. Our judicial system, as confirmed during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, stems from the Crown's authority, and no court can be set up in England without the King/Queen and Parliament's approval. *. This principle is rooted in the Bill of Rights. *. Administrative Courts are considered unlawful and any act that undercuts the Constitution is an act of treason. *. Judges, under the Promissory Oaths Act *, are prohibited from administrative acts on behalf of the executive. *. Breaching this oath is perjury under the Perjury Act * Sec *. 'Administrative Law' isn't part of the 'laws and usages of the realm'. *. Any unlawful act, including issuing summons without a case file and due process cannot be le-gitimised, thus any liability order obtained is ‘null and void’. *. European Communities Act * (c. *) SCHEDULE * – Provisions as to Subordinate Legislation Document Generated: *-*-* *.(*) The powers conferred by section *(*) of this Act to make provision for the purposes men-tioned in section *(*) (a) and (b) shall not include power— (a) to make any provision imposing or increasing taxation; or (b) to make any provision taking effect from a date earlier than that of the making of the instru-ment containing the provision; or (c) to confer any power to legislate by means of orders, rules, regulations or other subordinate instrument, other than rules of procedure for any court or tribunal; or (d) to create any new criminal offence punishable with imprisonment for more than two years or punishable on summary conviction with imprisonment for more than three months or with a fine of more than [F1level * on the standard scale] (if not calculated on a daily basis) or with a fine of more than [F2£* a day]. *. (*) Sub-paragraph (*)(c) above shall not be taken to preclude the modification of a power to leg-islate conferred otherwise than under section *(*), or the extension of any such power to pur-poses of the like nature as those for which it was conferred; and a power to give directions as to matters of administration is not to be regarded as a power to legislate within the meaning of sub-paragraph (*)(c). *. I reflect upon the schedule that predates the Local Government Finance Acts of * and *. *. This situation casts significant doubt on the validity of Council tax bills and, prior to them, the poll tax. *. Certain documents, including demand notices, liability orders, attachment of earnings orders, and property seizures, may have been inappropriately issued for primary residences intended for private domestic use. *. This suggests that the legislation itself may have been flawed from the outset. *. Thus, this communication serves as a formal notice of the potential ramifications of fraud and property theft, whether it pertains to monetary assets or individuals' residences. *. These circumstances deserve further consideration, as it appears that taxation and orders may have been misapplied, leading to inappropriate seizure of assets and homes under the 'Taking Control of Goods Regulations *' - Commercial Rents. *. This regulation's exemptions, including the principal and only home, suggest several individuals have unjustly lost assets and homes, despite their efforts to pay these potentially unlawful bills. *. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/*/*/schedule/*/*-*-* *. Where is the full and completed case file CPR part *. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31 This letter serves as a LAWFUL NOTICE. The assertion that I as the sole beneficiary of the Cestui Que trust, should not be subject to any recovery action against the Crown copyrighted name of the trust MR GJ TAYLOR, and shouldn't be subject to any recovery action. A reminder that all rights are reserved under UCC *-*. Could you please provide a clear and prompt response? Statement of Truth I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth, I believe that the facts stated in this document and any continuation sheets are true
Your letter is comprehensive and well-detailed. However, it would be beneficial to simplify some parts for clarity. For example, in Paragraph *, it would be clearer to state: "I, the undersigned, am the sole beneficiary of the Cestui Que trust, for which MR GJ TAYLOR is the Crown copyrighted name."
Also, be sure to provide evidence backing your claims where applicable, such as in Paragraph *, where asserting administrative courts are illicit.
elaborate
Your letter is detailed and touches on a variety of legal points. However, it is quite complex and may be challenging for the recipient to understand. Here are a few suggestions:
*. Simplify your language and structure for better clarity.
*. Provide evidence or legal references to back up your claims, particularly when stating that administrative courts are unlawful.
*. Consider seeking legal advice to ensure your letter is legally sound and effectively communicates your position.
*. Judges' Oaths, under Section * of the Promissory Oaths Act *, prohibit administrative acts on behalf of the executive. Contravening this Oath constitutes perjury.
Your statement about Judges' Oaths under Section * of the Promissory Oaths Act * seems correct. However, it's worth noting that administrative acts are generally performed by civil servants, not judges. If there's a specific case where you believe a judge has acted contrary to this, you should seek legal advice.
*. As affirmed by Lord Halsbury and Lord Denning, no court can exist in England without the authority of the Crown and Parliament.
Your statement is correct. Under English law, courts derive their authority from the Crown and Parliament. However, administrative acts are generally performed by government departments and agencies, not courts. Therefore, it would be helpful if you could clarify your concern about administrative acts.
they are unlawful
Your concerns about the lawfulness of administrative acts are understandable. It's important to note that while courts derive their authority from the Crown and Parliament, administrative acts are typically carried out by governmental departments or agencies. If you believe these acts are unlawful, it would be advisable to seek legal advice to understand your rights and potential remedies.
so where is authority of the Crown and Parliament
The authority of the Crown and Parliament in England comes from the constitutional principles established over centuries. Their authority is exercised through legislation and court judgements. If you believe an administrative act contravenes these principles, you can challenge it in court.
*. 'lord halsbury demonstrates clearly the domestic property was removed from rating/taxation'
Your statement about Lord Halsbury indicates that domestic properties were removed from rating/taxation. Could you provide more context or a specific reference to the law or case that supports this claim? This information would help to better understand your legal concerns.
*. Our judicial system, as confirmed during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, stems from the Crown's authority, and no court can be set up in England without the King/Queen and Parliament's approval.
Your statement is correct. According to English law, no court can be established without the approval of the Crown and Parliament. However, your concerns seem to be about administrative acts, which are typically performed by governmental departments, not courts. If you believe these acts are unlawful, you may want to seek legal advice.
yes and admin courts are unlawful
Your concerns about administrative courts are noted. However, it's crucial to understand that administrative acts are typically authorised under laws passed by Parliament. If you believe there's a breach of law, consider seeking legal advice to challenge the legality of these acts in a court of law.
*. Judges, under the Promissory Oaths Act *, are prohibited from administrative acts on behalf of the executive. *. Breaching this oath is perjury under the Perjury Act * Sec *. 'Administrative Law' isn't part of the 'laws and usages of the realm'
Your statements about the Promissory Oaths Act * and Perjury Act * indicate that you believe judges are prohibited from performing administrative acts for the executive. While judges should remain independent, administrative law is a part of the UK legal system. Could you provide more context or a specific case that led to your concerns?
*. European Communities Act * (c. *) SCHEDULE * – Provisions as to Subordinate Legislation Document Generated: *-*-* *.(*) The powers conferred by section *(*) of this Act to make provision for the purposes men-tioned in section *(*) (a) and (b) shall not include power— (a) to make any provision imposing or increasing taxation; or (b) to make any provision taking effect from a date earlier than that of the making of the instru-ment containing the provision; or (c) to confer any power to legislate by means of orders, rules, regulations or other subordinate instrument, other than rules of procedure for any court or tribunal; or (d) to create any new criminal offence punishable with imprisonment for more than two years or punishable on summary conviction with imprisonment for more than three months or with a fine of more than [F1level * on the standard scale] (if not calculated on a daily basis) or with a fine of more than [F2£* a day]. *. (*) Sub-paragraph (*)(c) above shall not be taken to preclude the modification of a power to leg-islate conferred otherwise than under section *(*), or the extension of any such power to pur-poses of the like nature as those for which it was conferred; and a power to give directions as to matters of administration is not to be regarded as a power to legislate within the meaning of sub-paragraph (*)(c). *. I reflect upon the schedule that predates the Local Government Finance Acts of * and *. *. This situation casts significant doubt on the validity of Council tax bills and, prior to them, the poll tax. *. Certain documents, including demand notices, liability orders, attachment of earnings orders, and property seizures, may have been inappropriately issued for primary residences intended for private domestic use. *. This suggests that the legislation itself may have been flawed from the outset. *. Thus, this communication serves as a formal notice of the potential ramifications of fraud and property theft, whether it pertains to monetary assets or individuals' residences. *. These circumstances deserve further consideration, as it appears that taxation and orders may have been misapplied, leading to inappropriate seizure of assets and homes under the 'Taking Control of Goods Regulations *' - Commercial Rents.
Your reference to the European Communities Act *, the Local Government Finance Acts of * and *, and the 'Taking Control of Goods Regulations *' suggests you have concerns about the legality of certain taxation and property seizure practices. Could you clarify the specific issue or incident that prompted these concerns? This would help me understand your situation better and provide more focused information.
This letter serves as a LAWFUL NOTICE. The assertion that I as the sole beneficiary of the Cestui Que trust, should not be subject to any recovery action against the Crown copyrighted name of the trust MR GJ TAYLOR, and shouldn't be subject to any recovery action. A reminder that all rights are reserved under UCC *-*. Could you please provide a clear and prompt response?
You've expressed concerns about potential recovery action against the Crown copyrighted name of the Cestui Que trust, MR GJ TAYLOR. Could you please clarify what specific recovery action you're referring to and how it could potentially impact you as the beneficiary of the trust?
regardless i am not a corporation
Your assertion that you're not a corporation and therefore shouldn't be subject to certain recovery actions is noted. However, legal personhood and liability can be complex. If you're unsure about your legal standing or obligations, it's advised to seek professional legal advice to clarify your rights and responsibilities.
elaborate
It appears you're asserting that as an individual and not a corporation, certain laws and recovery actions should not apply to you. This can be a complex area of law. It's important to consult with a legal professional who can provide advice based on your specific circumstances and legal jurisdiction.
i believe the content in the above letter clearly cover the unlawfulness of admin courts
Your letter indeed covers a vast range of legal points, including your concerns about the lawfulness of administrative courts. To further assist you, could you please elaborate on the specific issues you've encountered with these courts? This will help to provide more targeted advice.
this case is on its way to the supreme court
It's significant that your case is heading to the Supreme Court. Could you provide more details about the nature of your case and the specific legal issues it involves? This would help in understanding your situation better.
unlawfulness of council tax and admin courts being used for fake liability orders
I understand your case involves the lawfulness of council tax and the use of administrative courts for issuing what you believe are 'fake' liability orders. Could you please provide more details about the circumstances that led to these liability orders being issued against you?
LO order
Your case appears to concern a Liability Order (LO) issued due to council tax. If you believe it's invalid, it's crucial to seek legal representation. Remember, authorities can take further action if the LO is not addressed, including bailiffs or deductions from wages or benefits.
i am representing myself with the help of you
I'm here to help provide general legal information. It's important to understand that a Liability Order (LO) is a court order that allows a council to take further enforcement action to collect unpaid Council Tax. If you believe the LO was issued unlawfully, it may be worth bringing this to the attention of the court.
The LO is null and void and you know that
Your assertion that the Liability Order is null and void is noted. Could you please provide the specific reasons you believe this to be the case? This will help in offering more targeted legal information.
read the letter
Your letter indicates that you believe the Liability Order (LO) is void due to:
*. Unlawfulness of administrative courts issuing LOs
*. Your status as a beneficiary of a trust, not a corporation
*. Potential inconsistencies with taxation laws
If you firmly hold these views, presenting your case effectively before the court is crucial, including all supporting evidence and legal arguments.