Magistrates Courts And Council Tax

So why do you state that when halsbury states otherwise

So explain this document in detail summarising all the unlaw points raised. Lawfully Enter Rebellion Birth Certificate FRAUD Magna Carta * Council TAX FRAUD Cancer Act * PDF’S Baron David Of The House Of Ward Affidavit of Truth Statement of Fact Submit YouTube Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful. by steveadmin on Friday, June 14th, * | Comments Off Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful. Councils and The CSA may want read this: The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation. The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year *, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts. In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes. Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers. The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England. This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb * October * vol * cc246-* * at *: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.” * -* – * vol * cc246-* * at *. [*/*/* *:*:*] catherine.crossan1: Halsbury’s Laws of England/ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (VOLUME *(*) (* REISSUE))/*. INTRODUCTION/(*) SCOPE AND NATURE OF THE SUBJECT/*. Scope. *. INTRODUCTION (*) SCOPE AND NATURE OF THE SUBJECT *. Scope. For the purposes of this work, administrative law1 is understood to mean the law relating to the discharge of functions of a public nature in government and administration. It includes the law relating to functions of pub-lic authorities and officers and of tribunals, judicial review of the exercise of those functions, the civil liability and legal protection of those purporting to exercise them and aspects of the means whereby extra-judicial redress may be obtainable at the instance of persons aggrieved2. * For at least half a century after the publication of Dicey’s Law of the Constitution (1st Edn) (*), the term ‘administra-tive law’ was identified with droit administratif, a separate body of rules relating to administrative authorities and officials, applied in special administrative courts. As thus defined, administrative law did not exist in England: see Dicey’s Law of the Constitution (10th Edn) *. See also Re Grosvenor Hotel, London (No *) [*] Ch * at *, [*] * All ER * at *, CA, per Salmon LJ; Ridge v Baldwin [*] AC * at *, [*] * All ER * at *, HL, per Lord Reid (‘We do not have a developed system of administrative law–perhaps because until fairly recently we did not need it’). Ridge v Baldwin supra, however, and a number of decisions which followed it, marked a significant change in judicial attitudes towards judicial control of administrative action. See Re Racal Communications Ltd [*] AC * at *, [*] * All ER * at *, HL, per Lord Diplock (‘[The case of Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [*] * AC *, [*] * All ER *, HL] is a legal landmark; it has made possible the rapid development in England of a rational and comprehensive system of administrative law on the foundation of the concept of ultra vires’); Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union [*] * QB * at *, [*] * All ER * at *, CA, per Lord Denning MR (‘… there have been important developments in the last 22 years which have transformed the situation. It may truly now be said that we have a developed system of administrative law’); IRC v National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd [*] AC * at *, [*] * All ER * at *, HL, per Lord Diplock (‘… [the] comprehensive system of administrative law [which] I regard as having been the greatest achievement of the English courts in my judicial lifetime’); O’Reilly v Mackman [*] * AC * at *, [*] * All ER * at *, HL, per Lord Diplock; Mahon v Air New Zealand Ltd [*] AC * at *, [*] * All ER * at *, PC (‘The extension of judicial control of the administrative process … over the last 30 years … has already gone a long way towards providing a system of administrative law as comprehensive in its content as the droit administratif of countries of the Civil Law, albeit differing in procedural approach, [and] it is a development [which] is still continuing. It has not yet become static either in New Zealand or in England’); R v Lancashire County Council, ex p Huddleston[*] * All ER * at *, * NLJ Rep *, CA, per Sir John Donaldson MR (‘Notwithstanding that the courts have for centuries exercised a limited supervisory jurisdiction by means of the prerogative writs, the wider remedy of judicial review and the evolution of what is, in effect, a specialist administrative or public law court is a post-war development. This development has created a new relationship between the courts and those who derive their authority from the public law, one of partnership based on a common aim, namely the maintenance of the highest standards of public administration’). Original source: http://www.landofthefree.co.uk/site/component/content/article/*-latest-news/*-administrative-courts-unlawful-halsburys-law Posted in Lawful Rebellion TITLES ACTOR AND PERSONS »« THE POWER OF WORDS Recomendations A Warrior Calls Anti Corruption Scotland Mike Clarke Patrick Cullinane John Harris GoodF Mark Ceylon Lawful Rebellion UK Column I-UV Freedom-School National Liberty Alliance Vatican canon law TGBMS Peace Officers Wanted splspro.com Common Law Court Self Realisation Famguardian Commercial Lien Process Guy Taylor ITCCS Birth Certificate Fraud British Constitution Group Swarb.co.uk Commercial Lien Tony Blair GUILTY of WAR CRIMES The Truth Will Out Swissindo JFK Green Hilton Agreement Cestui Que Vie One Heaven Commercial Lien Education Center EUROPA – The Last Battle Law cornell edu ucc icj2 UCC connection UCC Filing Filing A Commercial Lien Fortress wa gov ucc filing online ozff Promissory Notes USSEC Tracer Flag UCC FORTRESS.GOV Universal Law Community Trust Eyes Looking Categories * Acts Acts of Treason Bills Birth Certificate Fraud Blaby District Council Bristow Sutor Cancer Cures Cestui Que Vie Trusts Commercial Liens Corrupt Corporations Council Tax Fraud Courts Debt Collectors Declaration of Copyright Trademark Declaration of Rights DVLA EUROPA Lawful Rebellion Laws Magna Carta * Magna Carta * Maxims Notice Of Interest Patrick Cullinane PDF'S Public Notices Recomendations Santander Scottish Power Swissindo Templates Traitors Trusts UCC UN Depopulation Plan Universal Contract Videos wkikpedia Recent Posts How To Win In Court NOCNOC Blaby District Council, Council Tax Challenge Face2face Contact TRESPASSING AGAIN * April * Phone Call To Leicester Crown Court Are The Leicester Magistrates Court Aiding And Abetting In Fraud Baron David Ward Affidavit of Truth Statement of Fact Shoe Horned Into The EU…. TREASON Face2face Contact ltd Served Notice of High Treason It’s All Treason Leicestershire Police Served High Treason Notice PC * David Gilbody Of The Leicestershire Police Utter A Fraudulent Warrant. All Courts Where Dissolved In * Under The Clearfield Doctrine. Journals Of The Houses Of Commons Volume * Page *-* What Is Crown Copyright Breaking News The UK Government Is BANKRUPT. FOR-THE-WRIT-OF-THE-HIGH-TREASON First And Final Warning Ross Maxwell Mcewan NATWEST Notice of Malfeasance Ross Mcewan NATWEST Modern History Sourcebook: Habeas Corpus Act, * HABEAS CORPUS THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY WRIT Archives June * May * April * February * January * December * October * September * July * February * November * October * June * May * February * October * August * July * June * May * April * March * January * December * November * October * September * August * July * June * May * Recommended Products

Emphasize on the whole document

Is Lord denning incorrect

HISTORY NEW CHAT I am FreeLawChat and I provide legal assistance to help you with your legal issue. What is your name? **** Hello! Magistrates courts and council tax are indeed lawful in the UK. Council tax is a local taxation system with domestic rates. Magistrates courts handle many cases, including council tax non-payment. Could you please specify your location and further elaborate on your problem So why do you state that when halsbury states otherwise Halsbury's Laws of England is an authoritative encyclopedia, but it doesn't make laws. Council tax and magistrates courts are established by UK law. If Halsbury's interpretation conflicts with yours, it may be best to consult a legal professional for clarification. So explain this document in detail summarising all the unlaw points raised. Lawfully Enter Rebellion Birth Certificate FRAUD Magna Carta * Council TAX FRAUD Cancer Act * PDF’S Baron David Of The House Of Ward Affidavit of Truth Statement of Fact Submit YouTube Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful. by steveadmin on Friday, June 14th, * | Comments Off Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful. Councils and The CSA may want read this: The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation. The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year *, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts. In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes. Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers. The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England. This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb * October * vol * cc246-* * at *: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.” * -* – * vol * cc246-* * at *. [*/*/* *:*:*] catherine.crossan1: Halsbury’s Laws of England/ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (VOLUME *(*) (* REISSUE))/*. INTRODUCTION/(*) SCOPE AND NATURE OF THE SUBJECT/*. Scope. *. INTRODUCTION (*) SCOPE AND NATURE OF THE SUBJECT *.

separate and list each point raised and elaborate on the context

So where do I find a law source

LexisNexis refers to Lord denning stateing council tax is unlawful and administration courts are unlawful

Show the statement by Lord denning